🔗 Share this article

Over the weekend, Battlefield Studios launched a new game mode titled Relaxed Breakthrough. To put it simply, this mode resembles the standard Breakthrough setup but includes a few notable adjustments:

• Each team includes just 8 real players, with the rest made up of 32 bots.
• Actions performed by human gamers award full XP, while bot actions offer reduced XP.
• Only two locations are available: Siege of Cairo and Empire State.
• Elements like Dogtags, achievements, and stat tracking are disabled.

In short, this mode delivers on its title: it's a laid-back take of Breakthrough. At face value, one could assume it's a good idea, since it provides additional choices for players looking for alternative methods to enjoy the title. However, if video games have taught us anything, it's that not everyone will be happy. Which is to say, many BF6 players are upset.

Community Responses: From Fury to Praise

"Gamers prefer human opponents. Don't repeat the mistakes of your rivals," states one reply to the mode reveal. "Truly disappointing concept," says a different user. Meanwhile, in community forums, one user remarks, "It's unclear where we are headed with this title," while another lists all the issues they believe to be problematic in the game: "Resolve glitches, fix drone glitch, correct rocket mechanics, fix [the] bloom after sprinting bug, improve hit detection. We do not require this AI-heavy playlist."

On the other hand, for every complaint, there are players sharing how much they're liking the new mode. "It's enjoyable to practice, human participants prevent it from being a complete grind but it's very relaxed," reads one Reddit comment. "The community fails to see that there are gamers who actually go outside and can't play this title 24/7. Allow them to strike a balance," states another. A response on Twitter clarifies that as they're "a battledad with limited time, this is perfect for me," and someone else applauds the mode for "not being overcompetitive."

Constructive Concerns and Community Input

Despite the support, players have constructive reasons to complain about Casual Breakthrough. A few folks have pointed out that it could increase queue times even longer for different playlists due to the sheer number of playlists currently available. On a similar note, certain regions often face AI-filled matches in the existing playlists. It also seems somewhat counterintuitive that the mode won't start without a required amount of human gamers, despite it primarily centers on fighting AI opponents.

Lastly, a major grievances is that Battlefield Portal was meant to provide complete rewards, including AI matches, but that was removed when they attempted to remove bot farms from the mode. Thus Casual Breakthrough feels like the player base meeting them halfway, as per forum feedback. A different user labels this addition as the developers "making a mistake so hard, I experienced great enjoyment in the initial release, why did they feel the need to adjust it?"

Looking Ahead: Adjustments Be Made?

Should Battlefield Studios has demonstrated something so far with the latest installment, it is that they're listening and responding to feedback. Assignments that were overly hard got fixed rapidly, as did the specific battle pass objectives. It is likely that, if their data indicates this recent mode isn't performing to their standards, they won't be shy to change it again.